comments

Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Anthropogenic Climate Change
⌃
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
⌃
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
⌃
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
⌃
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
■
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
↳
Motives of FOI requests are highly questionable
↳
Questions raised do not stand up to detailed scrutiny
↳
Spec interests have $ to create uncertainty-influence political agenda
↳
Hacked email refers to a "trick" to hide the decline
↳
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
↳
Hacked emails suggest desire to withhold data from publiic scrutiny
⇤
Amanpour on Climate Change
⇤
Call for a criminal investigation of climate change scientists
□
Reports redrafted under political pressure
□
Reluctance to release data / interpretations for independent review
□
Some areas of climate science may be too partisan, too centralized
□
Flaws in process don't necessarily invalidate main findings
□
IPCC process is sufficiently reliable
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip