Alogrithms are fixed interpretations

Humans can use conscious observation to step outside of an interpretation and think of alternatives and extensions. Algorithms, however, are inherently fixed interpretations. Thus no algorithmic account of the mind could ever be sufficient.

An algorithmic interpretation of the mind could never account for interpretative flexibility of conscious observation.

Peter Denning, 1990.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Mathematical insight is non-algorithmic
Alogrithms are fixed interpretations
The absurdity of algorithmic insight
Mathematical insight is not the important issue
Mathematical truth may evolve
Penrose's intuition is irrelevant
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip