The Differently Abled Reply

Blind, deaf, retarded, and other humans (arguably all others) lack some distinctly human cognitive abilities; yet we are still thought to think. Since our disabilities don't disqualify us, computer's disabilities shouldn't disqualify them..


Turing 1950 brings up deaf-blind Helen Keller (shown below) in a related discussion. 



Image source: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/keller-helen/index.htm

What disabilities arguments really need to show is:

  1. that computers necessarily lack the ability in question
  2. that the ability is question is essential either for thought per se or for human-level thought.
To discharge the second obligation would require psychology to specify the nature of thought much as chemistry specifies the nature of water and zoology the nature of tigers.  Psychology is still far from up to this.


RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers are inherently disabled 
The Differently Abled Reply
Lack diversity of behaviour
Strawberries and cream
Computers can't think about themselves
Computers can't make mistakes
Poor inductions from limited experience
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (1)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip