Thinking is a rule following process

Any psychological theory must ulitmately decompose psychological phenomena into neural processes that do not require intelligence to implement. Those neural processes can be characterised by Turing-type rules, and hence are computable.

Raymond J. Nelson, 1989.

Note:

Also see the "Do humans use rules as physical symbol systems do?" arguments on Map 3, the "Do connectionist networkds follow rules?" arguments on Map 5 and the "Is the relation between hardware and software similar to to that between human brains and minds?" arguments on Map 3.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
Yes: Automata can think
Thinking is a rule following process
Nonintelligent procedures can be noncomputable
Human functions can be captured by automata
Brains are automata, thus persons are too
Many human behaviors described algorithmically
Natural phenomena best understood via mechanism
Minds and automata have a finite number of states
Humans have an infinite capacity machines lack
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip