Specific rather than general goals have greater effects on behavior

Think global, act local: The effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization

Anna Rabinovich, Thomas A. Morton, Tom Postmes, and Bas Verplanken

doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.004

The effects of goal specificity on behavior have been studied mainly within the frameworks of goal-setting theory ([Locke and Latham, 1990] and [Locke and Latham, 2002]) and the implementation intention approach (e.g. Gollwitzer, 1993). Goal-setting theory suggests that in order to produce the maximal effect on performance, goals must be challenging, attainable, and specific. Specific goals are thought to be effective through increasing instrumentality—that is, the degree to which a goal is perceived as leading to an outcome. The theory also argues that goal commitment can act as a moderator of the effect of goal specificity. Goal commitment increases when goal attainment is perceived as important (valued outcomes) and an individual believes that he or she is capable of achieving a goal (high self-efficacy). Thus, goal specificity should have the most profound effect when both self-efficacy and value of the outcomes are high.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Responding to climate change?
Immediate action required
Who should do what?
Individuals
Does individual and small community action matter?
Local and individual goals can be more specific than global ones
Specific rather than general goals have greater effects on behavior
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip