Metadata

Discussion on Purplsoc papaer

Communities that endeavor for change gather around social objects, shared object of care that are embodied ubiquitously in the system in different forms as place, people, resource, structure, process, or outcome.

These social objects are generally oriented towards generating access, equity, caring, livelihood, thrivability, replicability or sustainability (desired outcomes/goal type of metadata). The common thread is in the protection and in the nurturing and reproduction of the distributed factors of opportunity and of ongoing health and thrivability of the system that ensure its ongoing regeneration.

clusters or self-directed social subsystems of cooperating, specialized agents sharing common values, visions and goals, and therefore able to agree on pathways, courses of action and roadmaps.

Each social subsystem has its own modes of operation, observation and interpretation (locative metadata), based on a reality that is only a partial vision of the world.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
An Open Source Pattern Language (re)generative of Commons
First Elaborations of Patterns for Systemic Interpretation
Discussion on the Purplsoc Paper
Metadata
Distributed Commons as Archetype
Frames - Worldviews - Engagement logics
Generative behavior - Generative Grammar - Centers as essence of life
Grammatization
Key Points
Separate variables in smaller segments - Jane Jacobs
The structure of the Language
The syntax
Wicked Problems
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip