Need to appreciate and incorporate multiple perspectives

A second dimension of complexity requires an appreciation of the different perspectives used by agents and agencies within the system (pluralism). Most of the population, including many experts and scientists, are not able to dis-identify from their own perspective sufficiently to be able to appreciate other people's perspectives fully. Until all the key perspectives are incorporated into a study then any analysis will be partial and any intervention likely to fail. [1]

"Within complex systems it is normal for there to exist radically different perspectives about how the system works or ought to work. The existence of these different perspectives adds significantly to the complexity of the system‟s operation, in part because messages and data will be interpreted differently by people with different perspectives and also because different agents and agencies are likely to be pursuing competing goals." [1]

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Tackling obesity in the UK
Barriers to change
Policy process struggles to address multi-factor, systemic problems
Need to appreciate and incorporate multiple perspectives
Adopt a whole systems approach to obesity
Bring together coalitions of local partners
Definitive evidence is often difficult to obtain
Relational complexity of problems makes them hard to grasp as a whole
Short-term pressures and incentives undermine long term plans
Desire for solutions undervalues real improvements
Hard to initiate, resource, and sustain cross-boundary action
Desire to prioritise options becomes a barrier to action
Government obesity efforts are too fragmented to be effective
Polarization and obfuscation are used as tactics in resisting change
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip