A significant point.

This is a significant point, but not relevant in this context. The presumption is the old research was done under the definitions of the time.

And if *one* participant no longer met the criteria then all the old research is invalid.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
ISPS-US Moving Forward Map
Moving Forward
What to do about language?
New language
"Schizophrenia"
Implication of changes in definition of "schizophrenia"
At first glance looks worrying but ...
Practical problems
1. Raw data usually only kept 10 years
A significant point.
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip