2. You'd wipe out all the research.

You could say that any studies carried out before 2013 (when the DSM-V was released) are invalid, but that would wipe out a century of research.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
ISPS-US Moving Forward Map
Moving Forward
What to do about language?
New language
"Schizophrenia"
Implication of changes in definition of "schizophrenia"
At first glance looks worrying but ...
Practical problems
2. You'd wipe out all the research.
Understood, but what's that got to do with it?
1. Raw data usually only kept 10 years
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip