National Health Service

The four publicly funded health care systems in the countries of the United Kingdom are referred to as the National Health Service (NHS). The individual systems are: National Health Service (England), Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland, NHS Scotland, NHS Wales.

Principles 

Seven key principles guide the NHS in all it does [3]:

(1) The NHS provides a comprehensive service available to all: This principle applies irrespective of gender, race, disability, age, sexual orientation, religion, belief, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity or marital or civil partnership status. The service is designed to diagnose, treat and improve both physical and mental health. It has a duty to each and every individual that it serves and must respect their human rights. At the same time, it has a wider social duty to promote equality through the services it provides and to pay particular attention to groups or sections of society where improvements in health and life expectancy are not keeping pace with the rest of the population.

(2) Access to NHS services is based on clinical need, not an individual’s ability to pay: NHS services are free of charge, except in limited circumstances sanctioned by Parliament.

(3) The NHS aspires to the highest standards of excellence and professionalism:

  • in the provision of high-quality care that is safe, effective and focused on patient experience
  • in the people it employs, and in the support, education, training and development they receive
  • in the leadership and management of its organisations
    and through its commitment to innovation and to the promotion, conduct and use of
  • research to improve the current and future health and care of the population

Respect, dignity, compassion and care should be at the core of how patients and staff are treated – not only because that is the right thing to do, but because patient safety, experience and outcomes are all improved when staff are valued, empowered and supported.

(4) The NHS aspires to put patients at the heart of everything it does: It should support individuals to promote and manage their own health. NHS services must reflect, and should be coordinated around and tailored to, the needs and preferences of patients, their families and their carers. Patients, with their families and carers where appropriate, will be involved in and consulted on all decisions about their care and treatment. The NHS will actively encourage feedback from the public, patients and staff, welcome it and use it to improve its services.

(5) The NHS works across organisational boundaries and in partnership with other organisations in the interest of patients, local communities and the wider population: The NHS is an integrated system of organisations and services bound together by the principles and values reflected in the Constitution. The NHS is committed to working jointly with other local authority services, other public sector organisations and a wide range of private and voluntary sector organisations to provide and deliver improvements in health and wellbeing.

(6) The NHS is committed to providing best value for taxpayers’ money and the most effective, fair and sustainable use of finite resources: Public funds for healthcare will be devoted solely to the benefit of the people that the NHS serves.

(7) The NHS is accountable to the public, communities and patients that it serves: The NHS is a national service funded through national taxation. The government sets the framework for the NHS, and it is accountable to Parliament for its operation. However, most decisions in the NHS, especially those about the treatment of individuals and the detailed organisation of services, are rightly taken by the local NHS and by patients with their clinicians. The system of responsibility and accountability for taking decisions in the NHS should be transparent and clear to the public, patients and staff. The government will ensure that there is always a clear and up-to-date statement of NHS accountability for this purpose.

Values

Patients, public and staff have helped develop this expression of values that inspire passion in the NHS, and that should underpin everything it does. Individual organisations will develop and build upon these values, tailoring them to their local needs. The NHS values provide common ground for cooperation to achieve shared aspirations, at all levels of the NHS.

(1) Working together for patients: The value of "working together for patients" is a central tenet guiding service provision in the NHS and other organisations providing health services. Patients must come first in everything the NHS does. All parts of the NHS system should act and collaborate in the interests of patients, always putting patient interest before institutional interest, even when that involves admitting mistakes. As well as working with each other, health service organisations and providers should also involve staff, patients, carers and local communities to ensure they are providing services tailored to local needs.

(2) Respect and dignity: Every individual who comes into contact with the NHS and organisations providing health services should always be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of whether they are a patient, carer or member of staff. This value seeks to ensure that organisations value and respect different needs, aspirations and priorities, and take them into account when designing and delivering services. The NHS aims to foster a spirit of candour and a culture of humility, openness and honesty, where staff communicate clearly and openly with patients, relatives and carers.

(3) Commitment to quality of care: The NHS aspires to the highest standards of excellence and professionalism in the provision of high-quality care that is safe, effective and focused on patient experience. Quality should not be compromised – the relentless pursuit of safe, compassionate care for every person who uses and relies on services is a collective endeavour, requiring collective effort and collaboration at every level of the system. The delivery of high-quality care is dependent on feedback: organisations that welcome feedback from patients and staff are able to identify and drive areas for improvement.

(4) Compassion: Compassionate care ties closely with respect and dignity in that individual patients, carers and relatives must be treated with sensitivity and kindness. The business of the NHS extends beyond providing clinical care and includes alleviating pain, distress, and making people feel valued and that their concerns are important.

(5) Improving lives: The core function of the NHS is emphasised in this value – the NHS seeks to improve the health and wellbeing of patients, communities and its staff through professionalism, innovation and excellence in care. This value also recognises that to really improve lives the NHS needs to be helping people and their communities take responsibility for living healthier lives.

(6) Everyone counts: We have a responsibility to maximise the benefits we obtain from NHS resources, ensuring they are distributed fairly to those most in need. Nobody should be discriminated or disadvantaged, and everyone should be treated with equal respect and importance.

The NHS Five Year Forward View – executive summary

The NHS has dramatically improved over the past fifteen years. Cancer and cardiac outcomes are better; waits are shorter; patient satisfaction much higher. Progress has continued even during global recession and austerity thanks to protected funding and the commitment of NHS staff. But quality of care can be variable, preventable illness is widespread, health inequalities deep-rooted. Our patients’ needs are changing, new treatment options are emerging, and we face particular challenges in areas such as mental health, cancer and support for frail older patients. Service pressures are building.

 

Fortunately there is now quite broad consensus on what a better future should be. This ‘Forward View’ sets out a clear direction for the NHS – showing why change is needed and what it will look like. [1] Some of what is needed can be brought about by the NHS itself. Other actions require new partnerships with local communities, local authorities and employers. Some critical decisions – for example on investment, on various public health measures, and on local service changes – will need explicit support from the next government.

The first argument we make in this Forward View is that the future health of millions of children, the sustainability of the NHS, and the economic prosperity of Britain all now depend on a radical upgrade in prevention and public health. Twelve years ago Derek Wanless’ health review warned that unless the country took prevention seriously we would be faced with a sharply rising burden of avoidable illness. That warning has not been heeded – and the NHS is on the hook for the consequences.

The NHS will therefore now back hard-hitting national action on obesity, smoking, alcohol and other major health risks. We will help develop and support new workplace incentives to promote employee health and cut sickness-related unemployment. And we will advocate for stronger public health-related powers for local government and elected mayors.

Second, when people do need health services, patients will gain far greater control of their own care – including the option of shared budgets combining health and social care. The 1.4 million full time unpaid carers in England will get new support, and the NHS will become a better partner with voluntary organisations and local communities.

Third, the NHS will take decisive steps to break down the barriers in how care is provided between family doctors and hospitals, between physical and mental health, between health and social care.

The future will see far more care delivered locally but with some services in specialist centres, organised to support people with multiple health conditions, not just single diseases.
England is too diverse for a ‘one size fits all’ care model to apply everywhere. But nor is the answer simply to let ‘a thousand flowers bloom’. Different local health communities will instead be supported by the NHS’ national leadership to choose from amongst a small number of radical new care delivery options, and then given the resources and support to implement them where that makes sense.

One new option will permit groups of GPs to combine with nurses, other community health services, hospital specialists and perhaps mental health and social care to create integrated out-of-hospital care – the Multispecialty Community Provider. Early versions of these models are emerging in different parts of the country, but they generally do not yet employ hospital consultants, have admitting rights to hospital beds, run community hospitals or take delegated control of the NHS budget.

A further new option will be the integrated hospital and primary care provider – Primary and Acute Care Systems – combining for the first time general practice and hospital services, similar to the Accountable Care Organisations now developing in other countries too.

Across the NHS, urgent and emergency care services will be redesigned to integrate between A&E departments, GP out-of-hours services, urgent care centres, NHS 111, and ambulance services. Smaller hospitals will have new options to help them remain viable, including forming partnerships with other hospitals further afield, and partnering with specialist hospitals to provide more local services. Midwives will have new options to take charge of the maternity services they offer. The NHS will provide more support for frail older people living in care homes.

The foundation of NHS care will remain list-based primary care. Given the pressures they are under, we need a ‘new deal’ for GPs. Over the next five years the NHS will invest more in primary care, while stabilising core funding for general practice nationally over the next two years. GP-led Clinical Commissioning Groups will have the option of more control over the wider NHS budget, enabling a shift in investment from acute to primary and community services. The number of GPs in training needs to be increased as fast as possible, with new options to encourage retention.

In order to support these changes, the national leadership of the NHS will need to act coherently together, and provide meaningful local flexibility in the way payment rules, regulatory requirements and other mechanisms are applied. We will back diverse solutions and local leadership, in place of the distraction of further national structural reorganisation. We will invest in new options for our workforce, and raise our game on health technology – radically improving patients’ experience of interacting with the NHS. We will improve the NHS’ ability to undertake research and apply innovation – including by developing new ‘test bed’ sites for worldwide innovators, and new ‘green field’ sites where completely new NHS services will be designed from scratch.

In order to provide the comprehensive and high quality care the people of England clearly want, Monitor, NHS England and independent analysts have previously calculated that a combination of growing demand if met by no further annual efficiencies and flat real terms funding would produce a mismatch between resources and patient needs of nearly £30 billion a year by 2020/21. So to sustain a comprehensive high-quality NHS, action will be needed on all three fronts – demand, efficiency and funding. Less impact on any one of them will require compensating action on the other two.

The NHS’ long run performance has been efficiency of 0.8% annually, but nearer to 1.5%-2% in recent years. For the NHS repeatedly to achieve an extra 2% net efficiency/demand saving across its whole funding base each year for the rest of the decade would represent a strong performance – compared with the NHS’ own past, compared with the wider UK economy, and with other countries’ health systems. We believe it is possible – perhaps rising to as high as 3% by the end of the period – provided we take action on prevention, invest in new care models, sustain social care services, and over time see a bigger share of the efficiency coming from wider system improvements.

On funding scenarios, flat real terms NHS spending overall would represent a continuation of current budget protection. Flat real terms NHS spending per person would take account of population growth. Flat NHS spending as a share of GDP would differ from the long term trend in which health spending in industrialised countries tends to rise as a share of national income.

Depending on the combined efficiency and funding option pursued, the effect is to close the £30 billion gap by one third, one half, or all the way. Delivering on the transformational changes set out in this Forward View and the resulting annual efficiencies could – if matched by staged funding increases as the economy allows – close the £30 billion gap by 2020/21. Decisions on these options will be for the next Parliament and government, and will need to be updated and adjusted over the course of the five year period. However nothing in the analysis above suggests that continuing with a comprehensive taxfunded NHS is intrinsically un-doable. Instead it suggests that there are viable options for sustaining and improving the NHS over the next five years, provided that the NHS does its part, allied with the support of government, and of our other partners, both national and local

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Obesity – Stakeholders
Stakeholders – Institutions
National Health Service
Change4Life
The Eat Well Plate
Clinical Commissioning Groups
Clinical Sentates
Commissioning Support Units
Health Education England
National Institute for Health Research
NHS England
NHS General Practitioners (GPs)
Health Professionals
UK Health system is under severe pressure on multiple fronts
Department of Health
5 A DAY
PHE – Obesity
Health and Wellbeing Boards
ACERO
Action on Sugar
Advertising Association
Advertising Standards Authority
Ajinomoto
Alcohol Concern
All Party Parliamentary Group on a Fit and Healthy Childhood
AMRC
Association for Nutrition
Association for the Study of Obesity
Association of Play Industries
British Association and College of Occupational Therapists
British Dietetic Association
British Heart Foundation
British Independent Retailers Association
British Medical Association
British Obesity Society
British Retail Consortium
BUPA
C3 Collaborating for Health
Cambridge Health Network
Cambridge Institute of Public Health
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy
Child Growth Foundation
Children's Food Trust
College of Contemporary Health
Consensus Action on Salt and Health
Counterweight
Department for Business Innovation & Skills
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Department of Health
Design Council
Diabetes UK
Directors of Public Health
Eating Better
EPODE European Network
European Association for the Study of Obesity
European Public Health Alliance
Eveque
Faculty of Public Health
Food and Drink Federation
Food for Life Partnership
Food Standards Agency
Fresh Produce Consortium
General Medical Council
Genetics of Obesity Study
Health & Social Care Information Centre
Health and Wellbeing Boards
Health Education Trust
Healthwatch
Heart Research UK
Heart UK
HENRY
HM Treasury
HOOP UK
Hydration For Health Initiative
Infant & Toddler Forum
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Living Streets
Local Government Association
London Health Commission
McKinsey Global Institute
MEND Foundation
MoreLife UK
MRC Population Health Sciences Research Network
National Audit Office
National Farmers Union
National Obesity Forum
NICE
OFCOM
Office for National Statistics
Ofsted
Play England
Public Health England
Rotherham Institute for Obesity
Royal College of General Practitioners
Royal College of Nursing
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Royal College of Physicians
Slimming World
Sport and Recreation Alliance
Sugar Nutrition UK
Sustain
Sustrans
The Health Well – Obesity Hub
The King's Fund
The Sleep Council
The UK Baby Friendly Initiative
UK Health Forum
ukactive
Weight Concern
Weight Watchers
Weight Wins
Wine and Spirit Trade Association
World Cancer Research Fund UK
World Health Organization
World Obesity Federation
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (5)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip