Where will AGI's source their goals and feedback?

AGIs, from a systems point of view, are a part of the Sapiens plurum group that invented them. As a cognitive component of a larger system, they need not have innate drives. They could potentially respond to alerts and seek homeostasis in other entities, such as humans. This would assure that AGIs act to benefit humans.

This then reinforces the critical nature of the AGI's definition of ingroup and outgroup. Whose feedback is considered relevant? Who is part of We and who are They?
 
Despite the fact that this age-old dilemma remains, by deriving AGI motivations from human emotion, we insurance that We does not become AGIs and They, humans
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Sapiens Plurum: Evolving interconnections of people & their creations
The future of humankind
Survival Issues
Where will AGI's source their goals and feedback?
Artificial General Intelligences (AGI's)
Can we ban Killer Robots?
Can we assure that meta-intelligences advance human interests?
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip