Music Industry Taking Advantage of Offenders

Record labels are abusing their ability to sue against offenders. The only way to stop this is by making music free online. It is absurd that a woman was ordered to pay  $96,000 a song for her downloads which totaled $2.31 million. Record labels are getting greedy and they need to be stopped.

Uni student to pay $974,000 - Summary

Music industries are using methods to track illegal downloading and then sue for the stolen tunes. Jammie Thomas-Rasset was ordered to pay $96,000 a song for her downloads totalling $2.31 million. She is appealing this case. Another student was ordered pay a total of $975,317 for his downloaded music. The case lawyers are making is that these people who are being charged with these crimes are just some of the "millions of decent young people who thought downloading music free of charge was fine."

I understand if these lebels want to identify people downloading music and stop it, but let the punishment fit the crime! Being charged millions of dollars is disgusting. A lot of offenders are good kids try to pay their way through school and made one bad decision. You should not go after them for millions!
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
PeaceTones
Law
Copyright
Should music be downloaded for free?
Yes
Legal
Music Industry Taking Advantage of Offenders
Streaming revenue
Allows artist to "bootstrap" their music career and own 100% of IP
Legitimacy of law
The law needs to adjust to changes in society, so do the artists.
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip