List of open questions on this issue

Balancing problems of complex- and ill -structured features
-How safe is safe enough?
-How low is low enough?
-How accurate is accurate enough?
-How perfect is perfect enough?
-How many nuclear reactors do we need to construct, plan, propose, decommission etc.?

RERF  has conclude

(1) Based on RERF studies , chronic exposure to a total dose of about 100 mSv would increase lifetime risk by 0.5 to 0.7 percentage point.

(2) Among people exposed to high dose radiation (at least 1 sievert), increased frequency of non-cancer disease (cataract, benign thyroid tumor, heart disease, etc.) has been observed.

(3) Our studies have not found thus far any inherited genetic effects from parental radiation exposure among the children of A-bomb survivors.

http://www.rerf.or.jp/rerfrad_e.pdf

We need visions, missions and actions with confidence under uncertainties with resilience.

We have not yet reached to share a common goals, orientations, or even better changes.
First problem is that we are not sure how to find  "the better" together.  Boundary conditions are open, which has been regarded as a dreamy state.   So called sustainable human developments might be an optimal expression, but .....

How to balance multi-lemma problems of complexities, diversities, trade-offs, uncertainties, ambiguities and uncertainties, e.g. EEE ? --> perception of importance of management expertise for keeping human resources, supply chain stabilities to adapt to the changing commercial and technical needs of the sector, ability to adapt and utilize new techniques and technologies and so on.

 
Good questions inspire fruitful actions.   Many good questions have been given in the history.

 

And now we are facing good and difficult questions on Fukushima. So...
 
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Open Discussion to go beyond "FUKUSHIMA" together!
List of open questions on this issue
A change in the public's perception of nuclear
Competition for human and technical resources
Costs escalation
Program Management Expertise
Time frames
Uncertainty around the future of the Geological Disposal Facility
Complex Situation after Fukushima Daiichi Accident by Joonhong Ahn
Resilience-how to get it?
Societal Issues for co-creation of new communities
How to deal with radioactive materials?
Values "FUKUSHIMA" produce for the future?
Hints for Success; How to recover; How to overcome
『核』における混沌
Examples of Articulation in Mass Media and Public Reports
Exemplars for Fukushima Vita Nova
Dialectic beyond Common Sense
Basic Data on FUKUSHIMA
Warnings and Alarms, or Challenges!
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip