Fuzzed symbols are not classical symbols

The dynamic patterns of neural activity Barnden correlates with symbols aren't like classical symbols, which can be composed and manipulated by well-understood logical operations: they're context dependent and only roughly correlated with events.

Christine A. Skarda & Walter J. Freeman, 1987.

Note: For discussion of the nonclassical symbolic representations, see the "Can connectionist nextworks exhibit systematicity" arguments on Map 5.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Symbolic Data Assumption
Non-symbolic explanation of smelling
Patterns of activity may be fuzzed symbols
Fuzzed symbols are not classical symbols
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip