Patterns of activity may be fuzzed symbols

The states of activity produced by the olafactory system may correspond to rough approximations of classical discrete symbols.

John Barnden, 1987.

The "distinctive stereotype of activity" (p.174) that Skarda and Freeman correlate with the inhalation of a learned odor may corerspond to the symbolic output of the olfactory systerm, which the brain then uses in classical symbol-manipulation style. It is consistent with AI to allow that these symbols "embody a certain amount of fuzz" (p.174).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Symbolic Data Assumption
Non-symbolic explanation of smelling
Patterns of activity may be fuzzed symbols
Fuzzed symbols are not classical symbols
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip