comments

The debate is transparent to all who wish to participate

Everything is open and competing positions can be analysed and compared by anyone with relevant interest and expertise

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
⌃
In Support of the Proposition
■
The debate is transparent to all who wish to participate
↳
Agree
↳
Neutral
↳
Disagree
□
A wider range of expertise can be recruited than traditional methods
□
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results
□
A platform is given to cranks and vested interests to push their views
□
Scientific models are more reliable and objective than public debate
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip