comments

Scientific models are more reliable and objective than public debate

Scientific modelling is far more reliable, objective and sophisticated than public debate, whether face to face or mediated electronically.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
⌃
In Support of the Proposition
■
Scientific models are more reliable and objective than public debate
↳
Agree
↳
Disagree
↳
Neutral
□
A wider range of expertise can be recruited than traditional methods
□
The debate is transparent to all who wish to participate
□
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results
□
A platform is given to cranks and vested interests to push their views
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip