The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results

By analogy with open source software the involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality and better maintained results. A contributor to a debate may refine his or her arguments in response to open discussion; one participant may extend or clarify as well as find flaws in the arguments of another.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
In Support of the Proposition
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results
Agree
Disagree
Neutral
A wider range of expertise can be recruited than traditional methods
The debate is transparent to all who wish to participate
A platform is given to cranks and vested interests to push their views
Scientific models are more reliable and objective than public debate
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip