The public isn’t competent to understand many risk assessment issues

In certain instances arguments hinge on technical and scientific questions. The general public does not have the expertise to understand these matters, let alone provide coherent arguments about them. In a crowdsourcing environment, how can these key technical issues be identified? And once identified, can they be communicated effectively by experts to the general public? Can crowdsourcing meld effectively with this more traditional approach to risk assessment?

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
Against the Proposition
The public isn’t competent to understand many risk assessment issues
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Statistical methods, and their limitations, are well established
The results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposes
More resources can potentially be accessed
The debate is democratized
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip