Free music downloads hurt artists and jeopardizes the art form.

Various studies show that music downloading severely cuts into total revenue (Peitz/Waelbroek 2004). Artists make such low profits on albums to begin with (less than $1 for a $10 album). The often low-paying job of musician would become even less appealing, and possibly impossible, to pursue.

Review of Peitz/Waelbroeck's "The Effect of Internet Piracy on CD Sales: Cross-Section Evidence"

    The internet has undoubtably changed the world marketplace. Goods and services once difficult or expensive to obtain can now be secured with a click of the mouse. Niche markets can expand into new territories, creating new wealth. Yet the internet also created new challenges in business. One of the greatest and most publicized issues of the last decade involved the internet marketplace, or the lack thereof. Music downloading, especially the Napster and Grokster cases, brought copyright infrigement and internet sales to the forefront of public attention.
Peitz and Waelbroeck studied the effect of music piracy during Napster's heyday- 2001 through 2002. While the results were not shocking, the reasons behind the results are.

Peitz and Waelbroeck calculated a total 9% decrease in CD sales in 2002 (Peitz/Waelbroeck 16), mostly due to illegal downloading (22% of the 9% is attributed to illegal downloading). Sites such as Napster and Kazaa were clearly culprits in the illegal dowloading culture, but other, less obvious concerns effected sales as well. Internet radio and music streaming gained popularity during the same time period, as did other "digital activities" such as social networking, information searching, and gaming (Peitz/Waelbroeck 15).

Despite the decrease in CD sales, Peitz and Waelbroeck do not place all blame on illegal downloading. The number of internet users participating in illegal music downloading sharply declined from 2001 to 2002, yet CD sales continued to drastically decline throughout the mid 2000s (Peitz/Waelbroeck 12,14). This raises an important question: are people loosing interest in music, or have the drastic changes in how we aquire music made it harder to enjoy the artform?

Music downloading has created new outlets for art. Artists must work to reach potential buyers through creative marketing and higher quality products, but audiences clearly are still not buying. If downloading copyrighted material became completely legal, one can only assume the quality and quantity of such art would suffer.



Peitz, Martin, and Patrick Waelbroeck. "The Effect of Internet Piracy on CD Sales: Cross-Section Evidence." pp 1-25. The Center for Economic Studies of Munich, January 2004.


RELATED ARTICLESExplain
PeaceTones
Law
Copyright
Should music be downloaded for free?
No
Social
Free music downloads hurt artists and jeopardizes the art form.
The artists would lose countless amounts of money and funding
People should not get something for free that takes money to create.
Preserve institutional arrangements assures music will be composed.
The Jefferson Warning- protecting IP is a state monopoly
We need to preserve individual's right to access
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip