comments

Bantering zombies can't think

Bantering zombies, using processing mechanisms far superior to those of the all possible conversations machine would still be unintelligent. No matter how much we enrich the machine's information processing, it can't think unless it's conscious.


Charles Karelis, 1986.

Supported by the "Consciousness is Essential to Thinking" Box 50.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
⌃
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate
⌃
The Psychologism Objection
⌃
All Possible Conversations Machine
■
Bantering zombies can't think
⇥
Consciousness is essential to thinking
□
All intelligent machines exhibit their designer's intelligence
□
Brute list-searcher can't respond flexibly to change
□
Chauvinistic to assume we're better than the machine
□
Machine can't pass the Cyberiad Test
□
Machine is dated
□
Machine redefines intelligence
□
What if we are all like this machine?
□
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip