comments

Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack

Use of force in self-defence requires an attack which is actual or imminent.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions
⌃
How should the international community respond?
⌃
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
⌃
Legal bases for use of force under international law?
⌃
Self-defence
⌃
Would a military strike meet definition of self-defence?
⌃
Military strike on Iran would not be self-defence
■
Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack
↳
There is no actual or imminent attack from Iran
□
It would be pre-emptive action, not self-defence
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip