Military strike on Iran would not be self-defence

A military strike on Iran would not meet the legal definition of self-defence.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions
How should the international community respond?
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
Legal bases for use of force under international law?
Self-defence
Would a military strike meet definition of self-defence?
Military strike on Iran would not be self-defence
It would be pre-emptive action, not self-defence
Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack
A military strike on Iran would be self-defence
A military strike would be pre-emptive rather than self-defence
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip