comments

Claimed benefits are dubious and prevention temporary

A military strike is only likely to delay the development of Iran's nuclear capability by a few years at most.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions
⌃
How should the international community respond?
⌃
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
■
Claimed benefits are dubious and prevention temporary
↳
Iran's nuclear facilities widely dispersed
↳
Iraq recovered soon after Israeli bombing
↳
Temporary prevention better than none
□
Degree of international support for a military attack on Iran?
□
Legal bases for use of force under international law?
□
Delay Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons
□
Consequences will be severe
□
If WAR is the answer, we are asking the WRONG question
□
May strengthen the regime internally (public opinion)
□
Military strike will encourage pursuit of nuclear weapons
□
Need for military strike reduced by the Stuxnet cyberattack
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip