comments

Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.

Information can be represented metaphorically as patterns in contexts. This dramatically reduces the complexity of all problems, and makes the "combinatorial explosion" model invalid and unnecessary in any form of intelligence.



Argument anticipated by Ned Block, 1981.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
⌃
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate
⌃
The Psychologism Objection
⌃
All Possible Conversations Machine
■
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.
↳
Combinatorial explosion of knowledge
↳
Machine is logically possible
□
All intelligent machines exhibit their designer's intelligence
□
Bantering zombies can't think
□
Brute list-searcher can't respond flexibly to change
□
Chauvinistic to assume we're better than the machine
□
Machine can't pass the Cyberiad Test
□
Machine is dated
□
Machine redefines intelligence
□
What if we are all like this machine?
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (1)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip