Yes: We need a new professional standard.

For multiple reasons, psychology and psychiatry cannot dispense with having “some” standard that establishes and limits the scope of its practice and regulates interfaces to physical medicine. This is reality despite the failure of the DSM-5 to meet even minimal standards of intellectual rigor and patient care. Professionals and patients cannot dispense with diagnosis as a step in treatment selection and follow up.

Even recognizing such labels as provisional, to abolish all diagnostic standards would be to open the profession to all manner of quacks and opportunists—almost certainly making things worse.

 

[more to come here]

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
ISPS-US Moving Forward Map
Helping People
New experiences
Do we use the same classification system?
1. Do not use existing classification system.
Do we need labels at all?
Yes: We need a new professional standard.
Redefine DSM as BOL: Book of Labels.
Proposal (1) -- The CMHAP
Proposal (2) - EoPD
Revised teaching curricula
Desired outcome
Yes: because of the money.
Yes: Comforting to those in distress.
No: See Alternatives
Yes: Go back to 1870s Cornwall!
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip