comments

Chauvinistic to assume we're better than the machine

A system that processes information differently than we do many not be intelligent in our sense, but we may not be in its sense either. To assume that human intelligence is is better than machine intelligence is chauvanistic.


Argument anticipated by Ned Block, 1981.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
⌃
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate
⌃
The Psychologism Objection
⌃
All Possible Conversations Machine
■
Chauvinistic to assume we're better than the machine
↳
Intelligence requires "richness" of information processing
□
All intelligent machines exhibit their designer's intelligence
□
Bantering zombies can't think
□
Brute list-searcher can't respond flexibly to change
□
Machine can't pass the Cyberiad Test
□
Machine is dated
□
Machine redefines intelligence
□
What if we are all like this machine?
□
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip