comments

Machine redefines intelligence

We normally conceive of intelligence relative to input-output capacity, not relative to internal-processing. Stipulating an internal processing condition on intelligence merely redefines intelligence.



Argument anticipated by Ned Block, 1981.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
⌃
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate
⌃
The Psychologism Objection
⌃
All Possible Conversations Machine
■
Machine redefines intelligence
↳
Machine is all echoes
□
All intelligent machines exhibit their designer's intelligence
□
Bantering zombies can't think
□
Brute list-searcher can't respond flexibly to change
□
Chauvinistic to assume we're better than the machine
□
Machine can't pass the Cyberiad Test
□
Machine is dated
□
What if we are all like this machine?
□
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip