Global evidence

There is emerging global evidence that social protection programmes may have a significant impact on the nutrition of households. Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have shown some success in reducing malnutrition.

Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have shown some success in reducing malnutrition. Six programmes have been identified mainly from Latin American countries, that paid families in return for an action such as vaccination of children (Behrman et al, 2001; Maluccio et al 2005; Glassman et al, 2006; Mesnard et al, 2005; Lagarde et al, 2007). Overall, the programmes showed an improvement in care seeking and an associated increase in the value of total household consumption of goods and services. In Mexico, the Progresa programme, which combined conditional cash transfers with nutritional education and micronutrient-fortified food supplements resulted in an extra 1 cm increase in height per year, which translated into a 10% reduction in the prevalence of stunting in children aged 12–36 months (Behrman et al, 2001). The Programa Familias en Acción in Colombia Mesnard et al, (2005) reported an increase after one year of 0.44 cm in height in children aged 0–12 months, whereas Red de Proteccion Social in Nicaragua (Maluccio et al, 2005) recorded a small decrease in the prevalence of stunting, from 41.9% to 37.1%, and that of underweight from 15.3% to 10.4% over 2 years.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Nutritional Status in Northern Nigeria
4. Indirect Nutrition Interventions
6. Social Protection (Conditional cash transfer)
Global evidence
Nigerian experiences
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (5)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip