comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Roger Penrose
Arguments advanced by Roger Penrose.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
⌃
Protagonists
Protagonists☜The contributions of over 300 protagonists can be explored via a surname search, or using the growing list developing here.☜D3B8AB
■
Roger Penrose
Roger Penrose☜Arguments advanced by Roger Penrose.☜D3B8AB
⇤
No: computers can't have emotions
No: computers can't have emotions☜Machines can never be in emotional states (they can never be angry, joyous, fearful etc), and emotions are necessary for thought.☜FFFACD
⇤
Low-level quantum effects are uncomputable
Low-level quantum effects are uncomputable☜The biological phenomena that underlie consciousness operate at a level which quantum effects could exert an influence. Because quantum effects are not computable, the brain and consciousness may be noncomputational and nonalgorithmic. ☜FFFACD
⇤
Mathematical insight is non-algorithmic
Mathematical insight is non-algorithmic☜Many problems of mathematics—eg Gödels incompleteness problem, the halting problem, etc—can be understood by conscious humans but cant be solved algorithmically. This shows mathematical insight is based on conscious non-algorithmic processes.☜FFFACD
⇤
The absurdity of algorithmic insight
The absurdity of algorithmic insight☜The claim that mathematical insight is algorithmic can be reduced to absurdity (see detailed text).☜FFFACD
⇤
Insight is essential even if it is fallible
Insight is essential even if it is fallible☜Just because insight is sometimes unreliable, we should not conclude that it plays no essential role in mathematics.☜FFFACD
⇤
Glymour and Kelly are too strict
Glymour and Kelly are too strict☜If Glymour and Kelly are right, then it is impossible to verify or refute any scientific theory. But in practice scientific theories can be tested. So it may be possible to test for algorithmicity even if absolute certainty cant be obtained.☜FFFACD
⇤
Gödelian insight is a slippery character
Gödelian insight is a slippery character☜The Gödelian insight can attach itself to any system that has been algorithmically specified, including an algorithmic specification of the Gödelization procedure.☜FFFACD
⇤
The Gödelian insight is all that we need
The Gödelian insight is all that we need☜Its not necessary to see the consistency of an entire formal system. The ability to pass from one formal system to the Gödel sentence of that formal system is enough.☜FFFACD
⇤
Connectionist networks are formal systems
Connectionist networks are formal systems☜Arguments used against the formal character of symbol manipulators apply equally well to connectionist networks [CNs]. Functions computed on a CN can also be computed on a serial machine and CNs can implement classical serial processing.☜FFFACD
⇥
Roger Penrose
Roger Penrose☜Arguments advanced by Roger Penrose.☜FFFACD
□
Alan Turing
Alan Turing☜Arguments advanced by Alan Turing.☜D3B8AB
□
Daniel Dennett
Daniel Dennett☜Arguments advanced by Daniel Dennett.☜D3B8AB
□
David Chalmers
David Chalmers☜Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and director of the Centre for Consciousness at ANU, and Professor of Philosophy and co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness at NYU.☜D3B8AB
□
David Cole
David Cole☜Arguments advanced by David Cole.☜D3B8AB
□
David Rumelhart
David Rumelhart☜Arguments advanced by David Rumelhart.☜D3B8AB
□
Douglas Hofstadter
Douglas Hofstadter☜Arguments advanced by Douglas Hofstadter.☜D3B8AB
□
George Lakoff
George Lakoff☜Arguments advanced by George Lakoff.☜D3B8AB
□
Georges Rey
Georges Rey☜Arguments advanced by Georges Rey.☜D3B8AB
□
Herbert Simon
Herbert Simon☜Arguments advanced by Herbert Simon.☜D3B8AB
□
Hilary Putnam
Hilary Putnam☜Arguments advanced by Hilary Putnam.☜D3B8AB
□
Hubert Dreyfus
Hubert Dreyfus☜Arguments advanced by Hubert Dreyfus.☜D3B8AB
□
Hugh Loebner
Hugh Loebner☜Arguments advanced by Hugh Loebner.☜D3B8AB
□
Jack Copeland
Jack Copeland☜Arguments advanced by Jack Copeland.☜D3B8AB
□
James McClelland
James McClelland☜Arguments advanced by James McClelland.☜D3B8AB
□
James Moor
James Moor☜Arguments advanced by James Moor.☜D3B8AB
□
Jerry Fodor
Jerry Fodor☜Arguments advanced by Jerry Fodor.☜D3B8AB
□
John Lucas
John Lucas☜Arguments advanced by John Lucas.☜D3B8AB
□
John Searle
John Searle☜Arguments advanced by John Searle.☜D3B8AB
□
Joseph F. Rychlak
Joseph F. Rychlak☜Arguments advanced by Joseph F. Rychlak.☜D3B8AB
□
Keith Gunderson
Keith Gunderson☜Arguments advanced by Keith Gunderson.☜D3B8AB
□
L.J. Landau
L.J. Landau☜☜D3B8AB
□
Ned Block
Ned Block☜Arguments advanced by Ned Block.☜D3B8AB
□
Robert French
Robert French☜Arguments advanced by Robert French.☜D3B8AB
□
Selmer Bringsjord
Selmer Bringsjord☜Arguments advanced by Selmer Bringsjord.☜D3B8AB
□
Stephen Kosslyn
Stephen Kosslyn☜Arguments advanced by Stephen Kosslyn.☜D3B8AB
□
Zenon Pylyshyn
Zenon Pylyshyn☜Arguments advanced by Zenon Pylyshyn.☜D3B8AB
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#2775
Node type:
Protagonist
Entry date (GMT):
7/20/2007 6:09:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
7/20/2007 6:09:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
1
Outgoing cross-relations:
9
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload