Turing Test misleads AI research

The Turing Test motivates AI researchers to accomplish a misleading goal—the general but arbitrary form of intelligence involved in carrying on normal conversation.

This kind of intelligence is arbitrary in that it is relative to specfic cultures.

AI researchers should focus instead on specific intellectual tasks that can be aggregated to form more generally intelligent systems, such as the ability to recognize patterns, solve differential equations, etc.

B. Meltzer, 1971.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
Turing Test misleads AI research
Can inductive evidence determine this?
No: passing the Test is not decisive
No: failing the Test is not decisive
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate
Yes: human imitation is sufficient
No: simulated intelligence isn't real intelligence
No: existing AI programs have passed the test
No: Test assumes representationalist theory of mind
No: Turing assumes the brain's a machine
Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally
No: ESP would confound the test
The Loebner Prize
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip