Linguistic evidence sufficient for good inductive inference

An inductive inference that a machine can think can be made by considering only linguistic behaviour; even if this inference needs to be revised later in the light of further evidence. Inferences made without full evidence are common in science.

Otherwise:

"scientists would never gather enough evidence for any hypothesis."

James Moor, 1987, p.1128.

Note: Supported by the "Inductive Interpretation" Box 108.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
No: passing the Test is not decisive
The Turing test is too narrow
Linguistic evidence sufficient for good inductive inference
James Moor
The Sense Organs Objection
Turing Test only provides partial evidence
You can't fool Mother Nature
Narrowness objections play misleading game
The Quick Probe Assumption
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip