comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Unaddressed objections
Objections to Feldstein's paper that he does not address in a subsequent reply are collected here.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Visualizing the Romney Tax Debate
Visualizing the Romney Tax Debate☜Tax reform has emerged as a major bone of contention in the 2012 Presidential election campaign. While President Obama has identified some tax changes, Governor Romney proposes major systemic reform. But is his plan - especially the proposals for individual taxation - viable?☜F1CEB7
⌃
Romney's plan stated
Romney's plan stated☜For individual taxation, Romney proposes rate cuts for all taxpayers to be funded by reducing or eliminating various tax preferences. His plan aims to do this without raising the tax burden on low and middle income taxpayers, defined as $200,000 or less. It also abolishes several other taxes.☜59C6EF
⌃
But does it compute?
But does it compute?☜In early August the Tax Policy Center produced an analysis showing that achieving all the goals of the Romney plan is mathematically impossible. Romney cited six studies in reply. Economists, journalists, bloggers and others then joined in on both sides. So is the plan mathematically possible?☜FFB597
⌃
No - it does not compute
No - it does not compute☜The Tax Policy Center argues in its analysis that the various elements of the Romney plan cannot all be achieved. The TPC paper has been invoked and/or defended by almost all of the critics of the Romney plan in the debate.☜59C6EF
⌃
The TPC case
The TPC case☜The essence of the Tax Policy Centers argument is contained in the excerpt from their paper cited below. We have parsed the argument into a set of premises that must be true for the argument to hold and mapped the debate about each.☜98CE71
⌃
Growth effect claim
Growth effect claim☜In estimating the revenue effect of the Romney tax reform, the TPC authors needed to make some assumptions about how tax reform affects economic growth. They argue that Romney tax reform would have little effect on GDP growth - but that their conclusions are robust even if some growth eventuates.☜FF97FF
⌃
Ignores growth potential
Ignores growth potential☜A number of critics of the TPC study claim it ignores the potential for major tax reform to increase economic growth through its effect on labor supply and capital formation. They argue such macro dynamic effects make the Romney plan viable without burdening low to middle income earners.☜EF597B
⌃
Growth-supportive studies
Growth-supportive studies☜For the growth objection to rescue the Romney plan, the increment to revenue they produce would need to be significant. Several attempts have been made to put ball-park figures on this in the studies the Romney camp cited in reply to the TPC. The main estimates are added separately.☜98CE71
⌃
3. Feldstein
3. Feldstein☜Harvard economist Martin Feldstein has defended the Romney plan in two articles (see citations). His approach differs from Rosen and Entin/McBride in that he relies on historical evidence that taxable income will rise rather than a growth simulation that implies increased revenue.☜98CE71
■
Unaddressed objections
Unaddressed objections☜Objections to Feldsteins paper that he does not address in a subsequent reply are collected here.☜EF597B
↳
Micro-behavioral offsets
Micro-behavioral offsets☜One of the authors of the TPC analysis argues that Rosen expects taxpayers to adjust their behavior to rate cuts, but fails to do so in a symmetrical fashion for reduced tax concessions. These would offset revenue gains from the former.☜98CE71
↳
Use of 2009 baseline
Use of 2009 baseline☜To produce his estimates Feldstein uses IRS data for 2009, the most recent year for which data is available - but also the worst year for the recession. Selecting a year when tax revenue was low artificially reduces the cost of the rate cuts - and the concession changes needed to offset them.☜98CE71
□
Addressed objections
Addressed objections☜In a reply to critics of his analysis Feldstein identifies and responds to four lines of objection. These are grouped here - together with a revised version of his paper in which he responds to them, adjusting some assumptions.☜EF597B
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
August 2024
>
<<
August 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
31
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
32
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
33
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
34
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
35
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Peter Baldwin
NodeID:
#232176
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT):
10/25/2012 5:28:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
10/25/2012 5:35:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload