Revised Feldstein

In response to objections, Feldstein produced a revised version of his analysis with assumptions closer to those of his critics. He stands by the core claim of his first paper - that the Romney scheme of cutting rates funded by base broadening without burdening the middle class - is viable.

The revised Feldstein paper has been linked the original by a Variation semantic cross-link (indicating the source is a variation on the target of the link).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Visualizing the Romney Tax Debate
Romney's plan stated
But does it compute?
No - it does not compute
The TPC case
Growth effect claim
Ignores growth potential
Growth-supportive studies
3. Feldstein
Addressed objections
Revised Feldstein
3. Feldstein
Elasticity too high
High income threshold
Liability step-up
Marginal rate too high
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip