Excluding sub-cognitive questions makes test unbiased

A machine's inability to answer subcognitive questions—e.g. questions about ranking associative pairings—may show that machines can never match human responses, but we can make the test unbiased by excluding such questions.

Argument anticipated by Robert French, 1990.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
No: failing the Test is not decisive
Turing Test is species biased
Excluding sub-cognitive questions makes test unbiased
A purely cognitive test isn't an intelligence test
The seagull test is species biased
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip