Legalisation would enable market regulation

In the absence of regulation illegal drugs, unlike alcohol and tobacco, cause even more harm than they would if they were regulated.

The market in alcoholic drinks is heavily regulated. Alcohol cannot legally be sold to minors or to people who are clearly drunk. There are limits on the amount of alcohol that alcoholic beverages can contain, and the amount of alcohol that they do contain must clearly be indicated on the bottle or can. Alcohol beverages must not contain contaminants or other illegal substances.

In the case of tobacco, many of the same stringent requirements pertain, and smoking in public places is already banned in the UK or shortly will be. All cigarette packages have stringent health warning printed on them.

The upshot of such regulation is that, while alcohol and tobacco cause great harm, they do not cause nearly as much harm as they would if they were wholly unregulated.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Drug Policy – A global perspective
Legalisation of drugs
All illegal drugs should be legalised
Arguments in favour legalising illegal drugs
Legalisation would enable market regulation
Harms drugs cause reduced by regulation
Prohibition doesn't achieve its objective
Stop the negative consequences of prohibition
Alcohol as harmful as some illegal drugs
Drug use is a matter for personal choice
Harmless use of illegal drugs is common
Illegal drugs generate no tax revenue
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip