comments

Law should be objective

It should not be the role of juries to arbitrarily decide whether they consider something 'reasonable' according to their own standards.  It is the very purpose of the law to define what is to be considered 'reasonable'.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Parental Force and Children
⌃
Should it be legal for a parent to smack a child?
⌃
Yes, depending on the circumstances and the degree
⌃
Who decides what is appropriate?
⌃
Juries should decide
■
Law should be objective
↳
Law is a blunt tool
□
Reasonable force is hard to define
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip