Objectives neither clear nor candid

The current drug strategy’s objectives are not clearly or candidly stated, and this can be counterproductive.

The two objectives – total abstinence and harm reduction - are jumbled together.

"One way of avoiding becoming a problem drug user is obviously not to become a drug user at all. Another is to use drugs but in ways that avoid problems and minimise risks. It is not clear which form of prevention is being advocated by the Home Office, and the ambiguity may be partly intentional.
 
However committed health agencies may be to minimizing the health damage that may result from drug use, the National Drug Strategy is driven from the Home Office and is presented primarily as a strategy for reducing crime. Crime cannot appear to be condoned in any form; therefore, drug use should not appear to be condoned.

It follows that, while many of those who implement the current drug strategy may in fact be working hard to help people who use drugs to use them more safely, they must not be seen to be doing so too overtly.

...Ministers should acknowledge publicly that they are indeed doing what they are doing already: that is, both trying to discourage people from using drugs at all and encouraging those who do insist on using drugs to use them sensibly. Such an approach seems to us more honest and more likely to succeed."
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Drugs Policy in the UK
What drugs policy measures are open to the UK?
Maintain current drugs policy
Current drugs policy is misconceived
Language inappropriate and misleading
Objectives neither clear nor candid
Associates all drug users with crime
Paints opponents as soft on crime
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip