What to avoid with respect to openness and learning?

What to avoid:

“Window dressing” public exercises go through the motions required by law or the dictates of PR before announcing a pre-determined outcome. Participants get on soapboxes or are repressed; fight or conform; get overridden or overwhelmed; and are definitely not listening to each other. Facilitation is weak or too directive, interfering with people’s ability to communicate with each other openly, adjust their stances, and make progress. Assertive, mainstream, and official voices dominate. Available information is biased, scanty, overwhelming, or inaccessible — and experts lecture rather than discuss and clarify. Lack of time or inflexible process make it impossible to deal with the true complexity of the issue. Organizers and facilitators are too busy, biased, or insecure to properly review and evaluate what they’ve done.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Public Engagement
Core Principles for Public Engagement
(4) Openness and Learning
What to avoid with respect to openness and learning?
Assertive, mainstream, and official voices dominate
Biased, scanty, overwhelming, or inaccessible information
Facilitation is weak or too directive
Lack of time or inflexible process
Organizers and facilitators don't review and evaluate properly
Participants get on soapboxes or are repressed
Window dressing and going through motions
High quality openness and learning?
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip