What to avoid with collaboration and shared purpose?

What to avoid:

Unresponsive power-holders deliver one-way pronouncements or preside over hostile, disrespectful or stilted conversations. Patronizing experts and authorities feel they already have all the answers and “listen” only to appease. Engagement has no chance of impacting policy because relevant decisions have already been made or are already in the pipeline, or because those in power are not involved or committed. Loud or mainstream voices drown out all others, while personal stories, emotions, and unpopular opinions are not welcomed. References to isolated data or studies are used to suppress other forms of input. Involvement feels pointless to participants, lacking clear purpose or a link to action.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Public Engagement
Core Principles for Public Engagement
(3) Collaboration and Shared Purpose
What to avoid with collaboration and shared purpose?
Engagement has no chance of impacting policy
Involvement feels pointless to participants
Loud or mainstream voices drown out all others
Personal stories, emotions, and unpopular opinions not welcomed
References to isolated data or studies suppress other forms of input
Unresponsive and patronizing authorities
High quality collaboration and shared purpose?
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip