Does parents having welfare benefit their children?

According to Robert E. Rector, PREMISE #1: Children in families with higher income seem to do better in life. PREMISE #2: Welfare can easily raise family income. Conclusion: Therefore, welfare is good for kids.

From this logic has sprung a relentless thirty-year effort to raise welfare benefits, expand welfare eligibility, create new welfare programs, and increase welfare spending. The current proposal from Congress to slow down the automatic growth of welfare spending violates these cardinal tenets of the liberal welfare system and thus has led to cries of alarm from the welfare establishment.

Does this mean that all parents should get on welfare to benefit their children?

I do not think that the article is saying that all parents should get on welfare. It is trying to say that the parents in poverty should at least conside applying for welfare, because it would benefit their children. Applying for welfare would help the children succeed in life because they will be living on a better income. They will also want to do better than their parents did so the will work harder.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Poverty and Welfare Politics and Policy in U.S.
Welfare
Does parents having welfare benefit their children?
"Welfare reform act of 1996"
Current Economy
Decline in Welfare
How does America fund the welfare program?
What percentage of welfare receipients are multigenerational?
When does a United States citizen qualify for welfare?
Why do Americans think Welfare is the Cause of Poverty?
Why has the perception of welfare gone to a hand out?
Why is the U.S. afraid of national health care?
Do all poor people live on welfare?
Is Welfare just a Monthly Check?
Welfare? Pros and Cons
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip