comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Computers have understood analogy
Existing computer models have discovered and understood analogies.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
Can computers think? [1]☜Can a computational system possess all important elements of human thinking or understanding? ☜FFB597
⌃
No: computers can't draw analogies
No: computers can't draw analogies☜Computers cant understand analogical comparisons or metaphors. For example, a machine could not understand the sentence: she ran like the wind.☜59C6EF
■
Computers have understood analogy
Computers have understood analogy☜Existing computer models have discovered and understood analogies.☜EF597B
↳
ACME
ACME☜ACME is a connectionist network that discovers cross domain analogical mappings. The ACME network uses structural, semantic, and pragmatic constraints to seek out those mappings.☜FF97FF
↳
SME
SME☜SME is a structure-mapping engine that discovers analogies between domains by a set of match rules. The analogies that result are judged according to the criteria of clarity, richness abstractness, and systemacity.☜FF97FF
↳
COPYCAT
COPYCAT☜COPYCATs neither a symbol manipulator nor a connectionist network—though it draws on both paradigms. Representations arent delivered hand-tailored to the model but are built up through fluid interaction between low-level and high-level components.☜FF97FF
□
Analogies and Metaphors not One to One
Analogies and Metaphors not One to One☜For any given metaphore or analogy there exists many different interpretations. Being able to consistently select the most appropriate one is not a prerequistite to thinking. See extended text for examples.☜EF597B
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
July 2024
>
<<
July 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
27
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
29
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
30
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
32
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#176
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT):
6/6/2006 2:28:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
11/29/2007 1:05:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload