comments

No: machines perform rather than understand maths

Machines only operate on uninterpreted symbols. Even when they perform operations corresponding to addition, they are merely shuffling symbols that are meaningless to them. These manipulations become mathematics only when humans interpret them.

63

Stanley L. Jaki, 1969, Fred Dretske, 1990.

Note: an earlier version of this claim was made by Ludwig Wittgenstein in the 1930s and published in Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics (1956a)

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
■
No: machines perform rather than understand maths
↳
The marijuana-sniffing dog
↳
Computers can learn to add
□
Should the definition of thought be broadened?
□
No: computers are inherently disabled 
□
No: computers can't have free will
□
No: computers can't have emotions
□
No: computers can't reason scientifically
□
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
□
No: computers can't draw analogies
□
No: computers can't be creative
□
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
□
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
□
No: computers can't be persons
□
Yes: because a brain is a computer
□
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
□
Yes: Existence entails Possibility
□
No: God gave souls to humans not machines
□
No: the implications too hard to face
□
Yes: The cellular processes of the brain can be simulated
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip