What to avoid with inclusion and diversity?

What to avoid:

Participants are mostly “the usual suspects” — perhaps with merely token diversity added. Biased information is presented, and expert testimony seems designed to move people in a specific direction. People do not feel that it is safe to speak up, or they have little chance to do so — and if they do, there is little sign that they are actually heard. Participants, stakeholders, or segments of the public feel their interests, concerns and ideas are suppressed, ignored, or marginalized. Anonymity is used to protect abuses of power, not vulnerable critics.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Public Engagement
Core Principles for Public Engagement
(2) Inclusion and Demographic Diversity
What to avoid with inclusion and diversity?
Anonymity used to protect abuses of power
Biased information is presented
Interests suppressed, ignored, or marginalized
Participation mostly by the usual suspects
People do not feel that it is safe or worthwhile to speak up
High quality inclusion and diversity?
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip