comments

No: the implications too hard to face

The consequences of machine thought are too dreadful to accept, therefore we should 'stick our heads in the sand' and hope that machines will never be able to think or have souls.

59


Argument anticipated by Alan Turing, 1950.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
■
No: the implications too hard to face
↳
The Transmigration Consolation
□
Should the definition of thought be broadened?
□
No: computers are inherently disabled 
□
No: computers can't have free will
□
No: computers can't have emotions
□
No: computers can't reason scientifically
□
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
□
No: computers can't draw analogies
□
No: computers can't be creative
□
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
□
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
□
No: computers can't be persons
□
No: machines perform rather than understand maths
□
Yes: because a brain is a computer
□
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
□
Yes: Existence entails Possibility
□
No: God gave souls to humans not machines
□
Yes: The cellular processes of the brain can be simulated
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip