Harms: There are still weapons of mass destruction

weapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Argumentation and Debate - 52602
Travis Slotemaker
MUSIC
Have You Forgotten?-Darryl Worley
We should continue to stay in the war to make sure it doesn't happen
Finish off 110% whatour goal is inthe war,make sure it doesnt happen
Harms: There are still weapons of mass destruction
If we stay we can find them and or stop production of them
There isn't a strong military to stop rebels with weapons.
We do not know if they still exist or ever existed
Inherency: Leaving will just enable them to fight back.
Solvency: Stay involved and finish them till there is no rebels
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (3)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip