Grand narrative of climate change is a costly/hypocritical distraction

Governments' espoused enthusiasm (where it exists) for climate treaties is often not borne out in action—either by failing to meet the targets or by via loopholes that render the targets meaningless. As such, the grand narrative is a costly distraction from urgent needs where progress can be made.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Responding to climate change?
Prioritise other challenges first
Grand narrative of climate change is a costly/hypocritical distraction
What challenges should humanity prioritise?
Direct resources at immediate improvements in quality of life
Policy response should be proportionate to costs, benefits and needs
Technological advances may make any current action irrelevant
All human and social problems will be exacerbated by AGW
De-carbonisation of global economy is synergistic with other tasks
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip