comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
E: Democratic governance of scientific advice
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Science Policy Research Agenda
Science Policy Research Agenda☜To address the need for policy makers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes the Centre for Science and Policy (CSaP) at the University of Cambridge assembled over 50 academics and policy makers to agree a new research agenda on the role of science in public policy.☜F1CEB7
■
E: Democratic governance of scientific advice
E: Democratic governance of scientific advice☜☜FFB597
↳
1. Public trust in expertise
1. Public trust in expertise☜What factors (for example, openness, accountability, credibility) influence the degree to which the public accept as trustworthy an expert providing advice?☜FFB597
↳
2. Democratic governance processes
2. Democratic governance processes☜What governance processes and enabling conditions are needed to ensure that policymaking is scientifically credible, while addressing a perceived societal preference for policy processes that are more democratic than technocratic?☜FFB597
↳
3. Incorporating public attitudes and values
3. Incorporating public attitudes and values☜How might the attitudes and values of diverse publics relating to science and technology, and their governance, be incorporated effectively into debates about the use of evidence in policy-making?☜FFB597
↳
4. Influence of scrutinising institutions
4. Influence of scrutinising institutions☜What has been the influence of scrutinising institutions, such as those of legislative bodies (e.g. Parliament, Congress, National Assembly or Bundestag) on the roles of science in policy-making?☜FFB597
↳
5. Transparency in expert advisory processes
5. Transparency in expert advisory processes☜What are the implications for their effectiveness of opening up expert advisory processes to different forms of transparency?☜FFB597
↳
6. Novel methods of engagement and dissemination
6. Novel methods of engagement and dissemination☜What are the implications for science-policy relations, and for the democratisation of science, of novel methods of engagement and dissemination (such as citizen science, and new media technologies, including social media)?☜FFB597
□
A: Role of scientific evidence in policymaking
A: Role of scientific evidence in policymaking☜Understanding the role of scientific evidence in policymaking☜FFB597
□
B: Framing questions and sourcing evidence and advice
B: Framing questions and sourcing evidence and advice☜Framing questions, sourcing evidence and advice, shaping research☜FFB597
□
C: Advisory systems and networks
C: Advisory systems and networks☜☜FFB597
□
D: Policy making amid uncertainty and disagreement
D: Policy making amid uncertainty and disagreement☜Policy making under conditions of uncertainty and disagreement☜FFB597
□
F: Understanding expert advisory processes?
F: Understanding expert advisory processes?☜How do scientists and policy makers understand expert advisory processes?☜FFB597
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
July 2024
>
<<
July 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
27
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
29
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
30
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
32
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#147654
Node type:
Issue
Entry date (GMT):
4/6/2012 12:50:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/6/2012 1:40:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload