comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
B: Framing questions and sourcing evidence and advice
Framing questions, sourcing evidence and advice, shaping research
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Science Policy Research Agenda
Science Policy Research Agenda☜To address the need for policy makers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes the Centre for Science and Policy (CSaP) at the University of Cambridge assembled over 50 academics and policy makers to agree a new research agenda on the role of science in public policy.☜F1CEB7
■
B: Framing questions and sourcing evidence and advice
B: Framing questions and sourcing evidence and advice☜Framing questions, sourcing evidence and advice, shaping research☜FFB597
↳
1. How do policy makers decide which questions to ask?
1. How do policy makers decide which questions to ask?☜How do policy makers decide which questions they should ask their expert advisors and when in the policy cycle they should be asked?☜FFB597
↳
2. New and emerging problems?
2. New and emerging problems?☜What are the most effective mechanisms for identifying the evidence required to inform policy-making on new and emerging problems?☜FFB597
↳
3. Changing sources of scientific evidence and advice
3. Changing sources of scientific evidence and advice☜How, and with what consequences, have the sources of scientific evidence and advice used by policy makers changed over recent decades?☜FFB597
↳
4. Differences across political cultures?
4. Differences across political cultures?☜In what ways do different political cultures shape the frameworks through which evidence and advice are sourced?☜FFB597
↳
5. When to include experts with conflicting views?
5. When to include experts with conflicting views?☜In what circumstances are policy problems likely to require the inclusion of experts with conflicting views?☜FFB597
↳
6. Mechanisms to include conflicting views?
6. Mechanisms to include conflicting views?☜When is it considered appropriate to consult experts with conflicting views, and what mechanisms can ensure that this takes place?☜FFB597
↳
7. Including different disciplines?
7. Including different disciplines?☜What factors influence whether different disciplines are included effectively when defining and addressing complex policy problems?☜FFB597
↳
8. Prioritisation and funding of research?
8. Prioritisation and funding of research?☜What are the mechanisms by which budgetary pressures and societal constraints on policy-making influence the prioritisation and funding of research?☜FFB597
↳
9. Anticipating future policy issues?
9. Anticipating future policy issues?☜What is the effectiveness of different techniques for anticipating future policy issues requiring science input?☜FFB597
□
A: Role of scientific evidence in policymaking
A: Role of scientific evidence in policymaking☜Understanding the role of scientific evidence in policymaking☜FFB597
□
C: Advisory systems and networks
C: Advisory systems and networks☜☜FFB597
□
D: Policy making amid uncertainty and disagreement
D: Policy making amid uncertainty and disagreement☜Policy making under conditions of uncertainty and disagreement☜FFB597
□
E: Democratic governance of scientific advice
E: Democratic governance of scientific advice☜☜FFB597
□
F: Understanding expert advisory processes?
F: Understanding expert advisory processes?☜How do scientists and policy makers understand expert advisory processes?☜FFB597
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#147555
Node type:
Issue
Entry date (GMT):
4/5/2012 10:59:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/6/2012 1:38:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload