What challenges should humanity prioritise?

What challenges should humanity prioritise? [Seeded with the conclusions of the <A href="http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Home.aspx" shape=rect target=_blank>Copenhagen Consensus 2008</A>.]

Copenhagen Consensus 2008 – Results
 
The goal of Copenhagen Consensus 2008 was to set priorities among a series of proposals for confronting ten great global challenges.
 
These challenges are: Air pollution, Conflicts, Diseases, Education, Global Warming, Malnutrition and Hunger, Sanitation and Water, Subsidies and Trade Barriers, Terrorism, Women and
Development.
 
A panel of economic experts, comprising eight of the world’s most distinguished economists, was invited to consider these issues. The members were:

  • Jagdish Bhagwati, Columbia University;
  • François Bourguignon, Paris School of Economics and former World Bank chief economist;
  • Finn E. Kydland, University of California, Santa Barbara (Nobel laureate);
  • Robert Mundell, Columbia University in New York (Nobel laureate);
  • Douglass C North, Washington University in St. Louis (Nobel laureate);
  • Thomas Schelling, University of Maryland (Nobel laureate);
  • Vernon L Smith, Chapman University (Nobel laureate);
  • Nancy Stokey, University of Chicago.
 The panel was asked to address the ten challenge areas and to answer the question, “What would be the best ways of advancing global welfare, and particularly the welfare of the developing countries, illustrated by supposing that an additional $75 billion of resources were at their disposal over a four-year initial period?”
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Responding to climate change?
Prioritise other challenges first
What challenges should humanity prioritise?
Malnutrition
Freer and fairer international trade
Disease
Education
Women
Water
Global Warming
Conflict Prevention
Air pollution
Direct resources at immediate improvements in quality of life
Policy response should be proportionate to costs, benefits and needs
Technological advances may make any current action irrelevant
Grand narrative of climate change is a costly/hypocritical distraction
All human and social problems will be exacerbated by AGW
De-carbonisation of global economy is synergistic with other tasks
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip